| |
Tuesday, May 04, 2004
Friday, July 11, 2003
 
|
If jews could get rid of Nazis without foreign intervene, Iranians can get rid of Mullahs.
Just compare the situation of these two.
Jews were peace loving people who never thought and beleived that such slaughter might happen. They just wanted to live in peace as ordinary people. So they never resisted against Nazi and complied with whatever they ordered until it was too late.
Iranians are peace loving people who never think and believe such tyranny and terror could be happened by their religous leaders. They just want to live in peace without any politics. They don't ever care for whatever the government did in the past 20 years. They were tired of revolution and war. Family men just wished to earn enough money for their family. Mothers don't want their daughters be arrested by police for just walking in the street. Youth were burnt for the wish to go to university and get educated. University students tried not to do anything wrong to be expelled from the university. University graduates tried hard to find a job ,( whatever and how cheap and low paid it was) to make a family, a warm hearting home with a wife and children and live in peace.
TO BECOME A FAMILY MAN.
This loop was endless and dark . Besides that there was no communication to the outside world. Iran was under siege , so foreigners could not understand what was going on in Iran. Iranians had no emails, satelites , web ,... to see how the world is changing. All they could see was through Iranian TV, which showed nothing but nonsense.
After years the loop became hopeless. There's no improvement in the situation, no matter who you were. Unless you're part of the ruling family or had the connections, or pretend to believe whatever they say.
The crack appeared in the loop by electing Khatami with 20 millions vote. Faces became happy. Life seemed to appear on the street cross where a boy sold the newspapers. All the people , as individuals realized that they are not alone, that the rest of the people are in the same boat, the infinite dark loop, despite they were silent.
What happened to all the happiness and life in the faces after 6 years. All is left are arrests , exiles , poverty and desperateness.
What will come next?
|
Tuesday, May 06, 2003
Thursday, May 01, 2003
 
|
It's seems that in the midst of the war everyone forget about cloning.
But they keep working.
According to their April 24th 2003 news they were able to found living cells in child's dead body
buried 4 months ago.
Congratulations! Will they recover Saddam or BinLaden, too ?
Or they just recover descent good people?
Future will reveal the truth.
|
Monday, April 07, 2003
 
|
I blame no one. No god , no human.
It's not good or bad anymore. It's just the way it is.
Is it time to leave?
|
Tuesday, March 18, 2003
Friday, March 14, 2003
آيا اين پايان سازمان ملل متحد است؟ |
"Neither did the U.N. approve when the Vietnamese army invaded Cambodia to get rid of the Khmer Rouge that had already killed half of that country's population. Nor did the U.N. applaud American action to remove tyrants from power in Grenada and Haiti, and restore democratic government. "
"The former U.N. secretary-general Boutros Boutros-Ghali has had the courage to admit that it was guilty of criminal negligence when it did not act to stop the genocide in Rwanda (some two million dead) or in the former Yugoslavia (half a million dead). More recently, the U.N. has turned a blind eye to the genocidal war waged by Russia in Chechnya where a whole nation is being destroyed. Each time anyone did anything to right a wrong it was outside the U.N. remit, as was the case in Kosovo."
"For much of the 1980s the U.N. watched, and presumably prayed, as over a million Iranians and Iraqis died in a war triggered by Saddam Hussein. The Security Council ended up by passing a resolution in 1988 that Iraq continues to violate. "
"The newest member, Switzerland, is not in the same category as one of the U.N.'s founding members, Afghanistan."
"The five permanent, or "veto" holding members, represent a balance of power that has long ceased to exist. Today India is a bigger player, in terms both of demography and economic power, than France, Britain, and Russia."
Amir Taheri's opinion about UN in "National Review" online.
Is it really the end of the "United Nations" in 21st century? The organization founded for peace between nations. Are we going to a new world war?
Will the new century start with clash of civilizaions?
|
|
|
| |
|
My thoughts about everything, which I can not chat about with anyone.
Maybe someday in the future, someone discover it.
Try to write everything in 2 languages, Persian and English. |
|